A building dispute arises when one party to a construction contract violates any of the provisions or warranties therein.
Some examples are, unreasonable delay in construction, damage to the works, defects, substandard quality, and the like.
Ways to Settle Building Disputes
The manner of settling building disputes may be adversarial or non-adversarial.
Adversarial methods include arbitration and litigation; while non-adversarial methods refer to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
How Do They Differ?
ADR: Some Key Highlights
1. ADR is the general term for different processes of settling disputes in an informal manner. ADR may be broken down into several subtypes including:
2. ADR procedures are completely distinct from, and do not involve, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) or the courts.
4. ADR may be voluntary or compulsory:
Common Forms of ADR
Mediation is an informal, private, and confidential dispute settlement process. During a mediation session, the parties will meet with a facilitator (aka “Mediator”), whose role is to help the parties arrive at a settlement agreement. The mediator must be neutral and must not influence the outcome of the meeting. The goal is to settle the dispute by an agreement freely arrived at by the parties, and not by a determination of each of their rights, obligations, and liabilities.
Similar to mediation, conciliation involves getting the parties together before a neutral, third party facilitator (aka “Conciliator”), whose role is to help the parties arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution of the dispute. Unlike in mediation, however, the Conciliator is less involved in the discussions. While he shouldn’t offer inputs or insights, he nevertheless needs to ensure that the conciliation session proceeds in a fair manner, and that no party is cajoled or intimidated by the other.
Another type of ADR commonly resorted to is expert determination, wherein the parties
agree to appoint a third party expert, like a building consultant, who is tasked with making an independent valuation or assessment of things like the quality of the work performed, or whether a contractor is entitled to extension of time. This is most relevant in cases where an expert’s technical know-how is required, such as when there is damage to the works or to the property. The expert’s findings are generally binding.
Your ADR Checklist
If you are required by your contract (or ordered by the VCAT or the court) to undergo ADR, or if you and your contractor decide to pursue ADR procedures, here are a few things to keep in mind:
How We Can Help
A construction lawyer would be able to give you relevant and practical legal advice, guide you throughout the entire dispute settlement process, and represent you at the VCAT or in court, if it comes to that.
Construction Lawyer Melbourne has over 10 years’ experience in building dispute resolution.
Give us a call to learn more about how we can help you. First consult is absolutely free.